Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Psychological Phenomena

Semmelweis Reflex

Confirmation and Motivated-Reasoning Biases

The Semmelweis reflex is the tendency to reflexively reject new evidence or new knowledge because it contradicts established norms, beliefs or paradigms, without evaluating the evidence on its own merits. The term refers to the Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis, who in the 1840s found that hand-washing with a chlorinated solution dramatically reduced deaths from childbed fever among new mothers, but whose findings were rejected and dismissed by much of the contemporary medical establishment, in part because they contradicted prevailing theories of disease. The phrase is used more broadly, beyond medicine, to describe any situation in which a community of practitioners or experts dismisses new evidence primarily because it conflicts with established practice or belief, rather than because the evidence itself has been shown to be flawed.

Facts
Core Claim
The Semmelweis reflex describes the reflex-like rejection of new evidence or new knowledge because it contradicts established norms, beliefs, or paradigms. 2
Classification
Type of Phenomenon
Cognitive Phenomenon 1
Sources
1. Ness Labs Thinking Toolbox: Semmelweis Reflex
  • opening section, definition
    The Semmelweis reflex is the tendency to automatically reject new information that contradicts our current understanding.
  • lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
    The Semmelweis reflex or "Semmelweis effect" is a metaphor for the reflex-like tendency to reject new evidence or new knowledge because it contradicts established norms, beliefs, or paradigms.
View the Source
2. Wikipedia: Semmelweis Reflex
Wikimedia Foundationlead section
Quote, lead section
The Semmelweis reflex or "Semmelweis effect" is a metaphor for the reflex-like tendency to reject new evidence or new knowledge because it contradicts established norms, beliefs, or paradigms.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.