Effects in which a belief is held or revised too little after new information contradicts it, including belief perseverance, the backfire effect and conservatism bias. A phenomenon belongs here when its cited article describes holding a belief against contrary evidence. Every member sits in the Psychology Atlas as its own page with a definition, cited sources and links to related effects, so the group works as a reading path through Belief Perseverance Effects rather than as a claim that the members share one cause. Where scholars disagree about how an effect should be classified, the member page says so.
All Belief Perseverance Effects
Filter Results4 entries
Sources
True-believer syndrome, Wikipedia
Has Member: True-Believer Syndrome, LeadQuote, Has Member: True-Believer Syndrome, Lead
He began using the term to refer to people who continued to believe in a paranormal phenomenon or event, even after it had successfully been debunked or proven to have been staged.
View the Source Wikipedia: Belief Perseverance
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: Belief Perseverance, Lead
Belief perseverance (also known as conceptual conservatism) is the maintenance of a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it.
Has Member: Backfire Effect, Lead
Belief perseverance (also known as conceptual conservatism) is the maintenance of a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it.
View the Source Wikipedia: Conservatism (Belief Revision)
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: Conservatism Bias, LeadQuote, Has Member: Conservatism Bias, Lead
In cognitive psychology and decision science, conservatism or conservatism bias is a bias which refers to the tendency to revise one's belief insufficiently when presented with new evidence.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.