Effects in which a belief is held or revised too little after new information contradicts it, including belief perseverance, the backfire effect and conservatism bias. A phenomenon belongs here when its cited article describes holding a belief against contrary evidence. Every member sits in the Psychology Atlas as its own page with a definition, cited sources and links to related effects, so the group works as a reading path through Belief Perseverance Effects rather than as a claim that the members share one cause. Where scholars disagree about how an effect should be classified, the member page says so.
Belief Perseverance Effects
Filter Results4 entries
Sources
True-believer syndrome, Wikipedia
Has Member: True-Believer Syndrome, LeadQuote, Has Member: True-Believer Syndrome, Lead
He began using the term to refer to people who continued to believe in a paranormal phenomenon or event, even after it had successfully been debunked or proven to have been staged.
View the Source Wikipedia: Belief Perseverance
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: Belief Perseverance, Lead
Belief perseverance (also known as conceptual conservatism) is the maintenance of a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it.
Has Member: Backfire Effect, Lead
Belief perseverance (also known as conceptual conservatism) is the maintenance of a belief despite new information that firmly contradicts it.
View the Source Wikipedia: Conservatism (Belief Revision)
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: Conservatism Bias, LeadQuote, Has Member: Conservatism Bias, Lead
In cognitive psychology and decision science, conservatism or conservatism bias is a bias which refers to the tendency to revise one's belief insufficiently when presented with new evidence.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.