Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Psychological Phenomena

Choice-Supportive Bias

Confirmation and Motivated-Reasoning Biases

Choice-supportive bias is the tendency to retroactively ascribe more positive attributes to an option one has chosen, and more negative attributes to options one rejected, than an objective assessment made at the time of the decision would support. Memory researchers have documented the pattern in studies asking people to recall the attributes of chosen and rejected options after a delay, consistently finding that recollections drift to make the chosen option appear to have been the clearly superior choice even when contemporaneous ratings showed the options were rated much more similarly. The bias is understood as a form of post-decisional memory distortion that helps people maintain confidence in past decisions and reduce cognitive dissonance about choices already made.

Facts
Core Claim
Choice-supportive bias, also called post-purchase rationalization, is the tendency to retroactively ascribe positive attributes to a chosen option and to demote the options not chosen. 1
First Described Year
2000 1
Classification
Type of Phenomenon
Cognitive Phenomenon 1
Connections

In Branch

Source Wikipedia: Choice-Supportive Bias
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Choice-Supportive Bias
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section, first sentence
    Choice-supportive bias or post-purchase rationalization is the tendency to retroactively ascribe positive attributes to an option one has selected and/or to demote the forgone options.
  • History section, Mather, Shafir and Johnson (2000)
  • lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
    It is part of cognitive science, and is a distinct cognitive bias that occurs once a decision is made.
  • In Branch: Cognitive Psychology, Categories
    Wikipedia article 'Choice-supportive bias' is filed under Category:Memory biases.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.