Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Psychological Phenomena

Berkson's Paradox

Probability and Statistical Reasoning Biases

Berkson's paradox is a statistical phenomenon in which two variables that are actually independent, or even positively correlated, in the general population can appear negatively correlated within a subgroup selected using a criterion related to both variables. It is named for the physician and statistician Joseph Berkson, who described it in 1946 in the context of hospital admission data, where he noted that studying only hospitalized patients could create an apparent negative association between two unrelated diseases simply because having either disease increased the chance of admission. The paradox is treated as a specific, statistically well-defined form of selection bias, and it remains a standard cautionary example in epidemiology and other fields that rely on data drawn from a non-random, already-filtered subgroup.

Facts
Core Claim
Berkson's paradox, also known as Berkson's bias, collider bias, endogenous selection bias or Berkson's fallacy, is a result in conditional probability and statistics that is often found to be counterintuitive, and hence a veridical paradox, arising from a sampling bias inherent in a study design. 1
First Described Year
1946 1
Classification
Type of Phenomenon
Cognitive Phenomenon 1
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Berkson's paradox
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Introduction
    Berkson's paradox, also known as Berkson's bias, collider bias, endogenous selection bias or Berkson's fallacy, is a result in conditional probability and statistics which is often found to be counterintuitive, and hence a veridical paradox.
  • References, Berkson citation
    Berkson, Joseph (June 1946). "Limitations of the Application of Fourfold Table Analysis to Hospital Data". Biometrics Bulletin.
  • lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
    Berkson's paradox, also known as Berkson's bias, collider bias, endogenous selection bias or Berkson's fallacy, is a result in conditional probability and statistics which is often found to be counterintuitive, and hence a veridical paradox.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.