Impact bias is the tendency to overestimate both the intensity and the duration of one's own future emotional reactions to upcoming events, whether positive or negative, compared with how those events are actually experienced once they occur. The psychologists Daniel Gilbert and Timothy Wilson, along with colleagues, documented the effect across a range of studies in the affective forecasting research program they developed beginning in the late 1990s, including findings that people consistently overpredicted how devastated they would feel after a romantic breakup or how elated they would feel after a desired outcome such as a promotion, relative to their actual reported feelings afterward. A key proposed cause of the bias is a failure to anticipate psychological coping processes, sometimes called immune neglect, through which people adapt to both good and bad events more quickly than they predict they will.
Facts
Core ClaimPeople overestimate both the intensity and the duration of their own future emotional reactions to upcoming events, while generally predicting the emotion's valence, positive or negative, accurately. 1 First Described Year Classification
Type of Phenomenon Connections
In Branch
Source Wikipedia: Impact Bias
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Impact Bias
Wikimedia Foundationlead paragraph
the impact bias, a form of which is the durability bias, is the tendency for people to overestimate the length or the intensity of future emotional states.
Example section, Gilbert et al. 1998 study paragraph
Gilbert et al. (1998) conducted a study on individuals participating in a job interview.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
In the psychology of affective forecasting, the impact bias, a form of which is the durability bias, is the tendency for people to overestimate the length or the intensity of future emotional states.
In Branch: Cognitive Psychology, Categories
Wikipedia article 'Impact bias' is filed under Category:Cognitive biases.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.