The foot-in-the-door technique is a compliance tactic that aims to get a person to agree to a large request by first having them agree to a smaller, more modest one. Once a person grants the smaller request, they tend to feel obligated to keep agreeing to larger ones, a pattern the term borrows from door-to-door salesmen who would keep a customer's door from shutting with a foot so the customer had no choice but to hear the full sales pitch.
Facts
Core ClaimAgreeing to a modest request first makes a person more likely to agree to a large request. 1 First Described Year Replication Standing Classification
Type of PhenomenonSocial or Interpersonal Phenomenon 1 Connections
In Branch
Source Foot-in-the-Door Technique - Wikipedia
Sources
1. Foot-in-the-Door Technique - Wikipedia
Overview
Foot-in-the-door (FITD) technique is a compliance tactic that aims at getting a person to agree to a large request by having them agree to a modest request first.
History (year)
The foot-in-the-door technique was first coined by Johnathan Freedman and Scott Fraser of Stanford University in 1966, when they conducted a study to try and prove this theory of granting smaller requests can lead to agreeing to larger requests.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
Foot-in-the-door (FITD) technique is a compliance tactic that aims at getting a person to agree to a large request by having them agree to a modest request first.
In Branch: Social Psychology, Lead sentence
Foot-in-the-door (FITD) technique is a compliance tactic that aims at getting a person to agree to a large request by having them agree to a modest request first.
View the Source2. FORRT: FORRT Replications and Reversals
FORRTEntry: Foot-in-the-door effectQuote, Entry: Foot-in-the-door effect
Foot-in-the-door effect. The foot-in-the-door effect occurs when getting people to comply with a very small initial request increases the likelihood that they will agree to a larger request (compared to starting with the larger request). Statistics Status: mixed
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.