In psychology, the Stroop effect is a delay in reaction time between congruent and incongruent stimuli, most famously demonstrated when a person is shown a color word printed in a mismatched ink, such as the word red printed in blue, and asked to name the ink color rather than read the word. Because the brain automatically reads the word, that reading interferes with the separate task of identifying the ink color, producing slower responses and more errors, and the effect has become one of the most studied demonstrations of how the mind handles conflicting information.
Facts
Core ClaimSourced to the subject's own accountIn a color-word naming task, an incongruent color name printed in a differently colored font delays reaction time and increases errors compared with a congruent or neutral stimulus. 1 First Described YearSourced to the subject's own account Replication Standing Classification
Type of PhenomenonSourced to the subject's own account Connections
Associated With
The Stroop Effect Experiments established the naming-interference finding this phenomenon is named for.
In Branch
Sources
1. Stroop Effect (Wikipedia)
WikipediaLead section, paragraph 1
In psychology, the Stroop effect is the delay in reaction time between neutral and incongruent stimuli.
Lead section, paragraph 3
The effect is named after John Ridley Stroop, who first published the effect in English in 1935.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
In psychology, the Stroop effect is the delay in reaction time between neutral and incongruent stimuli.
View the Source 2. FORRT: FORRT Replications and Reversals
FORRTEntry: Stroop EffectQuote, Entry: Stroop Effect
Stroop Effect. A phenomenon in which it takes longer to name the ink colour of a word when the word itself is a colour name that is different from the ink colour (e.g. the word “red” printed in blue ink). The Stroop effect is considered a classic demonstration of the interference between different types of information processing. Statistics Status: replicated
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.