Infrahumanisation is the tacitly held belief that one's own group is more fully human than an out-group, which is seen as less human, and it can arise from a comparison in which the in-group is viewed as fully human while the out-group is viewed as lacking humanness. The term was coined by Jacques-Philippe Leyens and colleagues in the early 2000s to distinguish this everyday phenomenon from dehumanisation, the outright denial of humanness associated with extreme intergroup violence such as genocide, since infrahumanisation instead arises when people view their in-group and an out-group as essentially different and reserve a full human essence for the in-group alone. The belief is seldom consciously endorsed and is instead reflected in the way people tacitly think about an out-group, which researchers have typically studied by examining the types of emotions people believe members of the in-group and out-group are capable of feeling.
Facts
Classification
Type of Phenomenon Type of Phenomenon Type of PhenomenonSocial or Interpersonal Phenomenon 1 Core ClaimInfrahumanisation is the tacit belief that one's own group holds a fuller human essence than an outgroup, reflected in attributing uniquely human emotions such as love, regret and nostalgia mainly to the ingroup while allowing the outgroup only emotions shared with animals, such as joy or anger. 1 Sources
1. Wikipedia: Infrahumanisation
Wikimedia Foundationlead paragraph, Wikipedia article Infrahumanisation
Infrahumanisation (or infrahumanization) is the tacitly held belief that one's ingroup is more human than an outgroup, which is less human.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
The term was coined by Jacques-Philippe Leyens and colleagues in the early 2000s to distinguish what they argue to be an everyday phenomenon from dehumanisation (denial of humanness) associated with extreme intergroup violence such as genocide.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification, additional value cognitive
Infrahumanisation (or infrahumanization) is the tacitly held belief that one's ingroup is more human than an outgroup, which is less human.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification, additional value emotional
Researchers have typically investigated infrahumanisation by looking at the types of emotions people believe ingroup and outgroup members possess.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.