Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Studies and Experiments

Simons and Chabris's Invisible Gorilla Experiment

Cognitive Psychology

In 1999 Daniel Simons and Christopher Chabris, then at Harvard University, published a study of sustained inattentional blindness that became widely known as the invisible gorilla experiment. Participants watched a short video of two teams, one dressed in white and one in black, passing basketballs, and were asked to count the number of passes made by one team while ignoring the other. Partway through the video a person in a gorilla suit walked into the middle of the scene, stopped to face the camera and thump its chest, and then walked off, remaining visible for about nine seconds. Roughly half of the participants across the study's conditions failed to notice the gorilla at all, with noticing rates varying depending on how visually similar the counted and ignored teams were and how demanding the counting task was. Simons and Chabris concluded that when attention is tightly focused on a demanding task, even a highly salient and unexpected object can go completely unperceived, a phenomenon they termed sustained inattentional blindness. The study became one of the most widely reproduced and cited demonstrations of the limits of visual attention in psychology.

Facts
Key Finding
In most groups, 50% of the subjects did not report seeing the gorilla (or the person with the umbrella). 1
Study Year
1999 1
Method
Participants
Human Adults 1
Connections

In Branch

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Inattentional Blindness
Wikimedia Foundation
  • References, Simons and Chabris citation
    Simons, Daniel J.; Chabris, Christopher F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28(9): 1059-1074.
  • Section: Invisible Gorilla Test
    In most groups, 50% of the subjects did not report seeing the gorilla (or the person with the umbrella).
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.