Edward Tolman, with Ritchie and Kalish, let rats explore a maze freely for several days with no food reward at all. When food was then placed at one point in the maze, the rats found it almost immediately, far faster than a group that had never explored the maze before. Tolman argued the unrewarded rats had already built an internal cognitive map of the maze during exploration, learning that stayed hidden (latent) until there was a reason to use it, a result hard to explain if learning only happens through reward. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Key FindingRats can learn the layout of an environment without any reinforcement and apply that latent learning as soon as a goal appears, evidence that learning is not only a matter of reinforced stimulus-response associations. 2 Method
Study DesignControlled Experiment (Lab or Field) 1 Participants Connections
Associated With
Tolman conducted his cognitive map research within a behaviorist methodology, while diverging from the radical behaviorist wing represented by Skinner.
Source Wikipedia: Edward C. Tolman
Tolman's maze experiments are the classic demonstration of latent learning and cognitive maps formed without reinforcement.
Conducted By
In Branch
Tolman's maze work is a standing bridge figure between behaviorism and the later cognitive branch; the study is placed in both branches rather than picking one over the other.
Sources
1. Edward C. Tolman (Wikipedia)
2. Wikipedia: Edward C. Tolman
Wikimedia FoundationPurposive behaviorism section
After some trials, a food item was placed to a certain point of the maze, and the rats learned to navigate to that point very quickly.
Associated With: Behaviorism, Article body, section "Purposive behaviorism"
Although Tolman was firmly behaviorist in his methodology, he was not a radical behaviorist like B. F. Skinner.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.