In 1975 Duncan Godden and Alan Baddeley published a study of context-dependent memory using eighteen recreational divers, who each learned a list of thirty-six unrelated two- or three-syllable words either on dry land or several meters underwater, and were then tested for recall in either the same or a different environment from where they had learned the words. The study found a clear interaction between learning and testing environment: divers who learned words underwater recalled them better when tested underwater than when tested on land, and divers who learned words on land recalled them better on land than underwater, regardless of which environment was objectively more comfortable or familiar. Godden and Baddeley interpreted the result as evidence that the physical surroundings present during learning become encoded as part of the memory itself and later serve as retrieval cues, a phenomenon they termed context-dependent memory. The diving experiment became one of the most widely cited real-world demonstrations of context effects on memory, though later replication attempts have produced more mixed results than the original study reported.
Facts
Key FindingGodden and Baddeley had scuba divers learn word lists either underwater or on dry land and then tested recall in either the same or a different environment; recall was best when the environment at retrieval matched the environment at learning, showing that the surrounding physical context is itself encoded as part of a memory and helps cue its retrieval. 2 Method
Study DesignControlled Experiment (Lab or Field) 1 Participants Sources
1. Context-dependent memory (Wikipedia)
2. Wikipedia: Context-Dependent Memory
Wikimedia FoundationHistory, Early research sectionQuote, History, Early research section
Their results demonstrated that memory for word lists learned under water was better when recall sessions occurred under water as well, and that a congruent effect existed for words learned and recalled on land.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.