In 1985, Simon Baron-Cohen, Alan Leslie, and Uta Frith at the MRC Cognitive Development Unit in London adapted Heinz Wimmer and Josef Perner's false-belief puppet paradigm into what became known as the Sally-Anne test. Children watch two dolls, Sally and Anne: Sally hides a marble in her basket and leaves the room, Anne then moves the marble to her own box, and the child is asked where Sally will look for it first. Correctly answering the basket requires representing a belief the child knows to be false, a mental-state inference the researchers took as a marker of theory of mind. Comparing a group of autistic children against mental-age-matched children with Down syndrome and typically developing children, the study found autistic children, despite normal or above-average performance on control questions, failed the belief question far more often than either comparison group. The result, published in the journal Cognition, became a founding demonstration for the theory that autism involves a specific difficulty attributing mental states to others, independent of general intellectual ability.
Facts
Key FindingAutistic children failed the false-belief question far more often than mental-age-matched Down syndrome and typically developing comparison children, despite the autistic group's higher average mental age, showing the deficit was specific to autism rather than general retardation. 1 Partially Attested
Study DesignControlled Experiment (Lab or Field) 2 Classified as a controlled experiment because the 1985 study compared autistic, Down syndrome and unimpaired groups; the source does not state random assignment, which is not possible for diagnostic groups. Method
Participants Connections
Associated With
The Sally-Anne test is the founding operationalization of theory of mind as an experimental false-belief task.
Source Wikipedia: Sally-Anne Test
Conducted By
Source Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith (1985): Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?
In Branch
Sources
1. Baron-Cohen, Leslie & Frith (1985): Does the Autistic Child Have a "Theory of Mind"?
Cognition (Elsevier)Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, abstract and introduction
We use a new model of metarepresentational development to predict a cognitive deficit which could explain a crucial component of the social impairment in childhood autism.
Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, abstract, direct quote: "Thus the dysfunction we have postulated and demonstrated is independent of mental retardation and specific to autism."
Thus the dysfunction we have postulated and demonstrated is independent of mental retardation and specific to autism.
Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, title page
Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?
Conducted By: Simon Baron-Cohen, Cognition 21 (1985) 37-46, author byline
SIMON BARON-COHEN, ALAN M. LESLIE, UTA FRITH, MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London
View the Source 2. Wikipedia: Sally-Anne Test
Wikimedia Foundation1985 Baron-Cohen study section
20 of whom were diagnosed autistic under established criteria, 14 with Down syndrome and 27 of whom were determined as clinically unimpaired.
Associated With: Theory of Mind, Article body, section on the belief question and what passing the test demonstrates
Passing the test is thus seen as the manifestation of a participant understanding that Sally has her own beliefs that may not correlate with reality; this is the core requirement of theory of mind.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.