The contrast effect is the tendency for the perceived quality, size or value of a stimulus to be judged not on its own terms but relative to a recently or simultaneously presented comparison stimulus, so that the same object can be judged more or less favorably depending on what it is compared against. The effect has been demonstrated across sensory judgments, such as perceived weight or temperature, and evaluative judgments, such as ratings of physical attractiveness or negotiation offers, and it is discussed extensively in psychophysics research tracing back to nineteenth century work on relative versus absolute judgment. In consumer and marketing contexts, the contrast effect is frequently invoked to explain why presenting an expensive option first can make a subsequently presented, still costly option seem comparatively reasonable.
Facts
Partially Attested
First Described YearYear marks Helson's adaptation-level theory (1964), the commonly cited theoretical origin; earlier psychophysical contrast work is not separately dated in the article. Core ClaimA contrast effect is the enhancement or diminishment, relative to normal, of perception, cognition or performance caused by successive or simultaneous exposure to a stimulus of lesser or greater value in the same dimension. 1 Classification
Type of Phenomenon Sources
1. Wikipedia: Contrast Effect
Wikimedia FoundationLead section, first sentence
A contrast effect is the enhancement or diminishment, relative to normal, of perception, cognition or related performance as a result of successive (immediately previous) or simultaneous exposure to a stimulus of lesser or greater value in the same dimension.
- Theoretical background, Helson's adaptation-level theory (1964)
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
A contrast effect is the enhancement or diminishment, relative to normal, of perception, cognition or related performance as a result of successive (immediately previous) or simultaneous exposure to a stimulus of lesser or greater value in the same dimension.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.