Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Branches of Psychology

Discursive Psychology

Communication Systems

Discursive psychology is a form of discourse analysis that focuses on psychological themes in talk, text and images. Rather than treating discourse as a mirror reflecting a speaker's inner thoughts, its founders conceived of it as a construction yard in which psychological notions are built from linguistic materials and managed through interaction, so that interaction itself, rather than something leaking out from cognition, becomes the primary site where psychological issues are live. The field emerged in the late 1980s through collaborative work at Loughborough University's Discourse and Rhetoric Group, with Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell's 1987 book Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour as a landmark early text, and it draws on post-structuralism, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology to examine naturally occurring and experimental human interaction, analyzing how evaluations, attitudes and psychological phenomena such as memory and identity are constructed through talk treated as social action rather than as a window into mental content.

Facts
Central Question
Discursive psychology treats talk as social action, holding that people say what they do as a means of, and in the course of, doing things in a socially meaningful world. 1
Key Debate
Discursive psychology is philosophically opposed to more traditional cognitivist approaches to language, which treat talk as a window into inner mental states rather than as social action. 1
Connections

Associated With

Rom Harre, Psychologists

His positioning theory work helped found discursive psychology's focus on language as social action.

Sources
1. Discursive psychology, Wikipedia
  • Study section
    Discursive psychology treats talk as social action; that is, we say what we do as a means of, and in the course of, doing things in a socially meaningful world.
  • Lead section
    It is philosophically opposed to more traditional cognitivist approaches to language.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.