Illusory superiority, sometimes called the better-than-average effect or the Lake Wobegon effect, is the tendency for people to overestimate their own positive qualities and abilities relative to other people, so that a clear majority of a group rates itself as above average on some desirable trait, a statistical impossibility if the group as a whole is being judged honestly. The effect has been documented across a wide range of domains, including driving ability, intelligence, job performance and ethical behavior, and it is considered one of the most consistently replicated findings in social psychology. The informal name Lake Wobegon effect references the fictional radio town where, according to the writer Garrison Keillor, all the children are above average.
Facts
Core ClaimIn a landmark 1981 study, Ola Svenson found that 93 percent of a U.S. sample and 69 percent of a Swedish sample of drivers rated themselves in the top half for driving skill, a mathematical impossibility if the whole group were being judged accurately, illustrating how widespread the bias is even in everyday self-assessments. 1 First Described Year Classification
Type of Phenomenon Connections
In Branch
Source Wikipedia: Illusory superiority
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Illusory superiority
Wikimedia Foundationdriving-ability study subsection, Svenson 1981
For driving skills, 93% of the U.S. sample and 69% of the Swedish sample put themselves in the top 50%; for safety, 88% of the U.S. and 77% of the Swedish put themselves in the top 50%.
terminology history subsection
The term "illusory superiority" was first used by the researchers Van Yperen and Buunk, in 1991.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
In social psychology, illusory superiority is a cognitive bias wherein people overestimate their own qualities and abilities compared to others.
In Branch: Cognitive Psychology, Categories
Wikipedia article 'Illusory superiority' is filed under Category:Cognitive biases.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.