The Dr. Fox effect is the finding that an expressive, engaging speaking style can lead an audience to rate a lecture highly even when its content is meaningless. In a 1970 study at the University of Southern California School of Medicine by Naftulin, Ware and Donnelly, a professional actor was introduced to audiences of psychiatrists, psychologists, educators and other professionals as Dr. Myron L. Fox, a supposed expert lecturing on mathematical game theory as applied to physician education, a topic deliberately chosen to be meaningless. Coached to deliver the material with an animated, humorous, confident manner full of double talk, invented terms, non sequiturs and contradictory statements, the actor received overwhelmingly positive evaluations from all fifty-five attendees despite conveying no real content. The effect is used as a caution that audiences, including trained professionals, can judge a speaker as knowledgeable based on style and delivery rather than on the substance of what is actually said, and it has since been cited in discussions of the limits of student evaluations as a measure of genuine teaching quality.
Facts
Core ClaimAn expressive, engaging speaking style can lead an audience to rate a lecture highly even when its content is meaningless. 1 First Described Year Classification
Type of PhenomenonSocial or Interpersonal Phenomenon 1 Connections
In Branch
Source Dr. Fox effect, Wikipedia
Sources
1. Dr. Fox effect, Wikipedia
Lead section
The Dr. Fox effect is a correlation observed between teacher attire, expressiveness, content coverage, student evaluation, and student achievement.
Experiment section
The original experiment was performed at the University of Southern California School of Medicine in 1970 in which two speakers gave lectures to a classroom of MDs and PhDs (psychiatrists and psychologists) on a meaningless topic.
In Branch: Educational Psychology, Categories
Wikipedia article 'Dr. Fox effect' is filed under Category:Educational psychology.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.