In 1944 the psychiatrist John Bowlby published Forty-Four Juvenile Thieves: Their Characters and Home-Life, a study comparing forty-four children referred to a child guidance clinic for stealing against a comparison group of forty-four emotionally disturbed but non-thieving children from the same clinic, drawing on clinical interviews and case history data gathered from the children and their families. Bowlby found that seventeen of the forty-four thieves, compared with only two of the forty-four non-thieving comparison children, had experienced a prolonged early separation from their mothers before the age of five, and that fifteen of those seventeen separated thieving children displayed a pattern Bowlby termed affectionless psychopathy, marked by an apparent inability to form deep emotional relationships or feel guilt or remorse. Bowlby argued that prolonged early maternal separation was strongly associated with this affectionless character and with later delinquent behavior such as theft. The study became a founding piece of evidence for Bowlby's subsequent maternal deprivation hypothesis and, more broadly, for his influential theory of attachment, though its retrospective clinical methodology and small non-random sample have since drawn extensive methodological criticism.
Facts
Key FindingOne of Bowlby's main findings through his research with these children was that 17 out of the 44 thieves experienced early and prolonged separation (six months or more) from their primary caregiver before the age of five. 1 Method
Study Design Participants Connections
Sources
1. Wikipedia: John Bowlby
Wikimedia FoundationCareer section, Forty-four Juvenile Thieves paragraph
During the first winter of World War II, Bowlby began working on his first published work Forty-four Juvenile Thieves. Although he began working on this book at the beginning of the Second World War, it was not published until 1944.
Career section, Forty-four Juvenile Thieves paragraph, comparison group
Bowlby examined 44 delinquent children from Canonbury who had a history of stealing and compared them to 'controls' from Canonbury that were being treated for various reasons but did not have a history of stealing.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.