Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theories and Concepts

Correspondent Inference Theory

Social Psychology

Correspondent inference theory is a psychological theory proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith E. Davis in 1965 that systematically accounts for how a perceiver infers what an actor was trying to achieve by a particular action. The theory sets out to explain why people make internal, dispositional attributions rather than external, situational ones, holding that people compare a chosen action against the alternatives available to evaluate whether the behavior reflects an internal disposition. Central to the theory is the covariation model, which weighs several factors in deciding how much to attribute a behavior to the person rather than the situation: whether the person had a real choice in taking the action, whether the behavior was expected by the person's social role, and whether the behavior was consistent with that person's normal conduct.

Facts
Core Claim
People infer whether an action reflects an internal disposition or the situation, to explain internal versus external attributions. 1
Origin Year
1965 1
Connections

Held Differently

Attribution Theory, Theories and Concepts

Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith Davis in 1965, was one of the first systematic attribution theories and is treated as a founding variant within the broader attribution theory tradition.

In Branch

Source Correspondent inference theory, Wikipedia
Sources
1. Correspondent inference theory, Wikipedia
  • Lead section, paragraph 1 (purpose)
    The purpose of this theory is to explain why people make internal or external attributions.
  • Lead section, paragraph 1 (proposal)
    proposed by Edward E. Jones and Keith E. Davis (1965)
  • In Branch: Educational Psychology, Categories
    Wikipedia article 'Correspondent inference theory' is filed under Category:Educational psychology.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.