Ways of analyzing or reporting data that produce misleading results, including p-hacking and hypothesizing after the results are known. A phenomenon belongs here when its cited article describes such a practice. Every member sits in the Psychology Atlas as its own page with a definition, cited sources and links to related effects, so the group works as a reading path through Questionable Research Practices rather than as a claim that the members share one cause. Where scholars disagree about how an effect should be classified, the member page says so.
Browse By
Questionable Research Practices
Filter Results2 entries
Sources
Data dredging, Wikipedia
Has Member: P-Hacking, LeadQuote, Has Member: P-Hacking, Lead
Data dredging, also known as data snooping or p-hacking, is the misuse of data analysis to find patterns in data that can be presented as statistically significant, thus dramatically increasing and understating the risk of false positives.
View the Source Wikipedia: HARKing
Wikimedia FoundationHas Member: HARKing, LeadQuote, Has Member: HARKing, Lead
HARKing (hypothesizing after the results are known) is an acronym coined by social psychologist Norbert Kerr that refers to the questionable research practice of "presenting a post hoc hypothesis in the introduction of a research report as if it were an a priori hypothesis".
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.