Psychology Atlas

How The Mind Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Psychological Phenomena

Pareidolia

Decision-Making and Judgment Biases

Pareidolia is the tendency for perception to impose a meaningful interpretation on a vague or ambiguous stimulus, usually visual, so that a person detects an object, pattern or face where none is actually present. It is a specific and very common form of apophenia, the broader tendency to perceive meaningful connections between unrelated things, already live on this atlas as its own related entity. Common examples include seeing animals, faces or objects in cloud formations, in inanimate objects, or in lunar features such as the Man in the Moon, and researchers have also demonstrated a version of face pareidolia in rhesus macaques, suggesting the tendency is not unique to humans.

Facts
Core Claim
Pareidolia is the tendency for perception to impose a meaningful interpretation on a nebulous stimulus, usually visual, so that one detects an object, pattern, or meaning where there is none. 1
First Described Year
1866 1
Classification
Type of Phenomenon
Perceptual Phenomenon 1
Connections

In Branch

Source Wikipedia: Pareidolia
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Pareidolia
Wikimedia Foundation
  • lead paragraph, first sentence
    is the tendency for perception to impose a meaningful interpretation on a nebulous stimulus, usually visual, so that one detects an object, pattern, or meaning where there is none.
  • Etymology section
    Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum introduced the German term Pareidolie in his 1866 paper "Die Sinnesdelierien" ("On Delusion of the Senses").
  • lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
    is the tendency for perception to impose a meaningful interpretation on a nebulous stimulus, usually visual, so that one detects an object, pattern, or meaning where there is none.
  • In Branch: Cognitive Psychology, Categories
    Wikipedia article 'Pareidolia' is filed under Category:Cognitive biases.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.