The Poggendorff illusion is a geometrical-optical illusion involving the misperception of the position of one segment of a straight transverse line that has been interrupted by the contour of an intervening shape, such as a rectangle drawn across it. It is named after the editor Johann Christian Poggendorff, who discovered the effect in 1860 while examining diagrams submitted by Johann Karl Friedrich Zöllner; Zöllner had been investigating an entirely different illusion, but his diagrams happened to reveal this separate diagonal-line-misalignment effect as well. The illusion has become a widely used tool in vision science and psychology for investigating perceptual systems, neurological function and cognitive development; its strength depends on the properties of the obscuring shape and its borders, and research shows that acute angles in the figure tend to look expanded to viewers, while the illusion weakens or disappears entirely when the lines are perfectly horizontal or vertical.
Facts
First Described YearPoggendorff discovered it in the figures Zöllner submitted when first reporting on the Zöllner illusion, in 1860. Classification
Type of Phenomenon Connections
In Branch
Source Wikipedia: Poggendorff Illusion
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Poggendorff Illusion
WikipediaLead section
It is named after Johann Christian Poggendorff, the editor of the journal, who discovered it in the figures Johann Karl Friedrich Zöllner submitted when first reporting on what is now known as the Zöllner illusion, in 1860.
lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
The Poggendorff illusion is a geometrical-optical illusion that involves the misperception of the position of one segment of a transverse line that has been interrupted by the contour of an intervening structure.
In Branch: Cognitive Psychology, Lead sentence
The Poggendorff illusion is a geometrical-optical illusion that involves the misperception of the position of one segment of a transverse line that has been interrupted by the contour of an intervening structure.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.