Socioemotional selectivity theory, developed by the Stanford psychologist Laura L. Carstensen, is a life-span theory of motivation maintaining that as time horizons shrink, as they typically do with age, people become increasingly selective, investing greater resources in emotionally meaningful goals and activities. Aging is associated with a relative preference for positive over negative information among individuals who have had rewarding relationships, a selective narrowing of social interaction that maximizes positive emotional experiences and minimizes emotional risks; the theory holds that the cause of these goal shifts is not age itself but an age-associated shift in time perspective, with knowledge-related goals giving way to emotion-related ones as people perceive less time remaining. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Core ClaimAs people perceive their remaining time as more limited, typically with advancing age, they shift their goals away from knowledge acquisition and toward emotionally meaningful relationships and experiences. 1 Connections
Developed By
In Branch
Source Wikipedia: Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Socioemotional Selectivity Theory
Wikimedia FoundationIntroduction
as time horizons shrink, as they typically do with age, people become increasingly selective, investing greater resources in emotionally meaningful goals and activities
Introduction, time horizon shift
as time horizons shrink, as they typically do with age, people become increasingly selective, investing greater resources in emotionally meaningful goals and activities
References, Carstensen 1992 citation
Carstensen, L. L. (1992). "Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity". Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 40: 209-54.
In Branch: Social Psychology, Categories
Wikipedia article 'Socioemotional selectivity theory' is filed under Category:Social psychology.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.