The exceptionality effect is the pattern by which people feel stronger regret, self-blame or a sense of injustice about a bad outcome when it followed an unusual action than when the identical outcome followed routine behavior. Daniel Kahneman and Dale T. Miller introduced the idea in 1986 as part of norm theory, arguing that people judge events against easily imagined alternatives, and that an exceptional action is easier to mentally undo than a routine one, which is why exceptional bad outcomes feel more avoidable and provoke a stronger emotional reaction; their original illustrations included a driver who has an accident after taking an unfamiliar route for variety, judged to feel more regret than one who has the same accident on a routine commute. A 2020 meta-analysis pooling 48 studies and 4,212 participants found a medium-to-strong exceptionality effect, with an overall effect size of 0.60 across measures of regret, counterfactual thinking and self-blame.
Facts
Classification
Type of Phenomenon Connections
Associated With
Introduced the exceptionality effect with Dale T. Miller in 1986 as part of norm theory.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Exceptionality effect
Wikimedia Foundationlead section, phenomenon-kind classificationQuote, lead section, phenomenon-kind classification
The exceptionality effect is a psychological bias describing the tendency for individuals to experience stronger negative emotional responses, such as regret, self-blame, or perceived injustice, when negative outcomes result from exceptional (abnormal) behavior compared to routine (normal) behavior.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.